Why does this effect occur? In order to attend to and focus on the object in the color required by the instructions, the perception of the other, overlapping object must be suppressed or inhibited. If such inhibition carries over to the next trial, it will interfere with the processing necessary to consciously perceive that object and thus will increase the time to respond. However, the perception of the object on the trial when it is suppressed is not a conscious one nor is the suppression on the next trial in any way conscious. Based on Tipper’s research, Anne Treisman and Brett De Schepper at the University of California at Berkeley extended the findings and uncovered some rather amazing facts. Instead of using overlapping familiar figures, they used the kinds of novel figure that Gutman and I had used, which necessitated a change in procedure. Since novel figures have no names, the investigators used what is referred to as a Same-Different matching task on each trial. On one side was a pair of overlapping figures, one green and one red, and the subjects were to say as quickly as possible whether the attended figure on one side was the same as or different than a white figure on the other side. On negative successive priming trials, the irrelevant colored shape on one trial would become the relevantly colored shape on the next. The researchers found that it required more time to respond on that second trial"same" or "different" if the now relevantly colored shape was the one that was irrelevant on the preceding trial. The surprising new finding, in addition to the fact that negative priming occurred for unfamiliar shapes, was that the effect lasted for long periods of time. If the irrelevant shape only appeared much later in the series, after many other intervening trials with many different figures, it still had a negative, delaying effect on reaction time. In fact, the unattended and unconsciously processed shapes exerted an effect even after many days or weeks intervened.